Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1992,16770
EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88 (https://dejure.org/1992,16770)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25.03.1992 - 13590/88 (https://dejure.org/1992,16770)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25. März 1992 - 13590/88 (https://dejure.org/1992,16770)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1992,16770) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    CAMPBELL c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 25, Art. 25 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 34 MRK
    Violation de l'Art. 8 Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 25, Art. 25 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 34 MRK
    Violation of Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings ...

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • Serie A Nr. 233
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (162)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72

    SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88
    It has also been recognised that some measure of control over prisoners" correspondence is called for and is not of itself incompatible with the Convention, regard being paid to the ordinary and reasonable requirements of imprisonment (see the Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 38, para. 98).

    In this respect the Court has consistently recognised a certain but not unlimited margin of appreciation to the States Parties in the imposition of the restrictions (see, inter alia, the Silver and Others judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, pp. 37-38, para. 97) under the supervision of this Court as to their compatibility with the Convention.

    Indeed, it seems quite clear from its judgment in the case of Silver and Others (Series A no. 61, in particular p. 39, para. 101) that the Court there considered that, making due allowance for their margin of appreciation, the authorities were entitled as a justifiable measure of control over prisoners" correspondence (and, by inference, irrespective of the extent to which they might have had prior cause for suspicion of abuse) to open and read - and in the circumstances of that case even to stop - a letter from a prisoner to his solicitor which did not relate to contemplated or pending proceedings.

  • EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77

    CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88
    It was considered, in the context of Article 6 (art. 6), that if a lawyer were unable to confer with his client without such surveillance and receive confidential instructions from him his assistance would lose much of its usefulness, whereas the Convention is intended to guarantee rights that are practical and effective (Series A no. 220, pp. 15-16, para. 48; see also, in this context, the Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, p. 49, paras. 111-113).
  • EGMR, 24.04.1990 - 11801/85

    KRUSLIN c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88
    2 (art. 8-2) and was "necessary in a democratic society" for the aforesaid aim or aims (see, amongst many others, the Kruslin v. France judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, p. 20, para. 26).
  • EGMR, 28.11.1991 - 12629/87

    S. v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88
    It was considered, in the context of Article 6 (art. 6), that if a lawyer were unable to confer with his client without such surveillance and receive confidential instructions from him his assistance would lose much of its usefulness, whereas the Convention is intended to guarantee rights that are practical and effective (Series A no. 220, pp. 15-16, para. 48; see also, in this context, the Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, p. 49, paras. 111-113).
  • EGMR, 06.12.2012 - 12323/11

    MICHAUD v. FRANCE

    Elle a souligné dans ce contexte qu'en vertu de l'article 8, 1a correspondance entre un avocat et son client, quelle qu'en soit la finalité (la correspondance strictement professionnelle étant incluse: Niemietz, précité, § 32), jouit d'un statut privilégié quant à sa confidentialité (Campbell c. Royaume-Uni, 25 mars 1992, §§ 46-48, série A no 233 ; voir aussi, notamment, Ekinci et Akalın c. Turquie, no 77097/01, § 47, 30 janvier 2007; cela vaut, comme indiqué précédemment, pour toutes les formes d'échanges entre les avocats et leurs clients).
  • EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 24173/18

    KLAUS MÜLLER v. GERMANY

    Darunter fällt unter anderem der Austausch mittels Briefen (siehe z. B. Schönenberger und Durmaz./. die Schweiz, 20. Juni 1988, Rdnrn. 23-24, Serie A Nr. 137, und Campbell./. das Vereinigte Königreich, 25. März 1992, Rdnr. 33, Serie A Nr. 233), über das Telefon (…siehe Kopp./. die Schweiz, 25. März 1998, Rdnr. 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II), mittels mündlicher Kommunikation (siehe Altay./. die Türkei (Nr. 2), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 11236/09, Rdnr. 51, 9.

    [4] Siehe Campbell./. das Vereinigte Königreich, 25. März 1992, Rdnr. 46, Serie A Nr. 233.

  • EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

    Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair

    The Court refers in this respect to its findings in Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, §§ 46-48, Series A no. 233) where it held that "it is clearly in the general interest that any person who wishes to consult a lawyer should be free to do so under conditions which favour full and uninhibited discussion.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht